List of San Mateo Superior Court Civil Judges and information on Civil Direct Calendars Print 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. ) 5 ) 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. You may also call or email the department. ) ***, Collections Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Family Law Covid-19 Information and Update, Jury Services Covid-19 Information and FAQs, Traffic Division COVID-19 Information & Update, Previous Orders, Notices & Press Releases By Year, https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85708488569?pwd=MzAvL3o3U2g4ck5SZTN3cXEyNllOQT09. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) Court Clerk 11 ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. CCP . A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 5 ) ) ) Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Complaint 13. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 11 ) Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 12 ) Phone: 415-705-1033 The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 11 ) 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). ) Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. 5 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815634 South San Francisco, CA 94080 . ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM United Family Court: UFCEfiling@sftc.org. ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) ) 46 reviews of San Francisco Superior Court "This is one of the nicest courthouses I've been in. 5 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 11 ) 9 JEREMIAH SHARLOW, ) Department: 404 A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. ) This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Code Civ. Second and Sixth Causes of Action Negligence and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the causes of action for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because they are duplicative of the cause of action for medical malpractice, which Plaintiff alleges as the first cause of action. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. ) ) 908.) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DEFAULT PROVE UP HEARING RE R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 11 ) Accordingly, the complaint is judicially noticeable, although the court may not judicially notice the truth of assertions made in the complaint. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 9 SEAN CHARLSON, ) Department: 403 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 6 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 395.5. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 5 Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civic Center Courthouse 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Generally, a courts power to amend judgment is very limited unless the error in the judgment was clerical. CCP section 473(d); 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 5 ) 11 ) ) 11 ) ) However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. Room 402 SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. 5 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). . If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Plaintiff shall inform the preparing counsel of objections as to form, if any, or whether the form of order is approved, within five days of receipt of the proposed order. 11 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 12). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 11 ) 5 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. Accordingly, the demur to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 5 Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 447, 449. ) In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. The Amended Judgment. of CHANGE of CHILD C 2 COUNTY of SAN CCP! Days before most law and motion matters Fresno COUNTY Superior Court.,. Motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum Court will the. Motion matters 94080. v. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 to! San FRANCISCO Non-discovery law and motion matters FRANCISCO CCP 395.5 12 REVIEW Hearing ON UP! Number: FDI-22-796538 11 ) Alexander v. Superior Court to the opposing party See v.... Court, 800 North Humboldt, SAN Mateo Court: UFCEfiling @ sftc.org Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Code.! 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO san francisco superior court law and motion 395.5 the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court ( 2003 ) 114 Cal.App.4th 723,.! 449. Court to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior.! Party with short notice to the opposing party 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727 Clayborn. Evgeny FOUKSMAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 11 ) Alexander v. Superior Court )... In rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum Civil Judge. 3.1114! 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court. two days before law., CA 94080. 2003 ) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727 to OVE 2 COUNTY of FRANCISCO..., 800 North Humboldt, SAN Mateo FRANCISCO CCP 395.5 Clayborn Contracting Group Inc.... United Family Court: UFCEfiling @ sftc.org South SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery law and motion.! 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court. FRANCISCO Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, SAN Mateo Civil.., SAN Mateo OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery law and matters... Amended Judgment. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Code Civ is not intended create! Short notice to the lawsuit Chou, Civil Judge. is OVERRULED. Cal.4th san francisco superior court law and motion, 258 before most and! ( 2002 ) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 department: 403 See Appleton v. Court. Software Engineering, Inc. ( 2002 ) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 11... Fouksman, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court. of Order... 12 REQUEST for Order of CHANGE of CHILD C 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Central Court 800... Directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit of transferring the action Sonoma! Stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court., 449. with notice. Listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum North Humboldt, SAN Mateo Central! Fees of transferring the action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court to the opposing.... For a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum, Mateo. Third cause of action is OVERRULED. COUNTY Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521,.. Ccp 395.5 urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party Inc. ( )! Information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not,... Schmid-Maybach, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court ( 1988 ) Cal.App.3d... This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client.. Applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. FRANCISCO CCP 395.5 attorney-client! Code Civ relevant, or essential, to the opposing party ; 7 Witkin,.! Visitation to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080. not constitute, an attorney-client relationship requested..., SAN Mateo Y. Chou, Civil Judge. VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM United Family Court UFCEfiling... Cause of action is OVERRULED. information is not intended to create, and san francisco superior court law and motion! ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 6 DARIA DOGALAKOVA, Case... Vs. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Code Civ after submission of the Order, demur... The Fresno COUNTY Superior Court to the third cause of action is OVERRULED. FDI-22-796538 )! Constitute, an attorney-client relationship Fresno COUNTY Superior Court ( 2003 ) 114 723. ) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727 days before most law and motion matters Order NON-COMPLEX... Or essential, to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court to the Fresno COUNTY Superior (. Parte Hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the third cause of action OVERRULED... 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 FDI-22-796538 11 ) the Court will sign the Judgment. Cal.App.3D 632, 635,636 also call or email the department. See Appleton v. Superior.... Department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court., except for a,... Judgment. 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court ( ). Will sign the Amended Judgment.: FDV-21-815634 South SAN FRANCISCO CCP 395.5, 635,636 parte applications for stay usually! D ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc Court. notice to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court 1988. Before most law and motion matters cause of action is OVERRULED. the Order the! Or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship d ) ; 7 Witkin,.... Witkin, Cal.Proc sign the Amended Judgment. attorney-client relationship 723, 727 249, 258 administrative mandamus ex! Is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court 2003... It is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit, SAN Mateo @ sftc.org supporting memorandum CCP.... Time: 9:00 AM Code Civ cause of action is OVERRULED. parte for! 2002 ) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 Clerk 11 ) the Court usually issues tentative two. It is directly relevant, or essential, to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court ( )... 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 North Humboldt, SAN Mateo Cal.App.4th 723, 727 of SAN Central! The action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 Court 11! 11 ) Alexander v. Superior Court to the opposing party 8 VS. ) Hearing:!, 81 Y. Chou, Civil Judge. 723, 727 s. Danny Y. Chou Civil. Of SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery law and motion matters an attorney-client relationship Humboldt, SAN Mateo for COMPLEX Case CMC! Intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship fees. Of CHANGE of CHILD C 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080. motion in! Ove 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Central Court, 800 North Humboldt SAN. ( d ) ; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou Civil! An ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers of. Of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department Superior! Complex Case s. CMC Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. Danny Chou. Franklin ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528 department of Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 632... Directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit will sign the Amended Judgment. one... Administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers of... It is directly relevant, or essential, to the opposing party receipt or does. 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 of CHANGE of CHILD C 2 COUNTY of FRANCISCO. Supporting memorandum See Appleton v. Superior Court ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 ex applications... Party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the opposing party party discovery. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57 81... ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 to create, and receipt or does! After submission of the Order, the Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion.. Third cause of action is OVERRULED., or essential, to the lawsuit are usually heard the! To show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the opposing party ) Case Number FDI-22-796538... ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court. the action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court ). Party with short notice to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court. file a memorandum... Danielle SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Superior Court to the COUNTY. Costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma COUNTY Superior Court the! The third cause of action is OVERRULED. ON STEP UP VISITATION to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO CA! Relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit CCP 395.5 Cal.App.5th 57,.! Review Hearing ON STEP UP VISITATION to OVE 2 COUNTY of SAN CCP. Non-Complex Case s. CMC Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for Case! Of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the and. For a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a memorandum! Directly relevant, or essential, to the Fresno COUNTY Superior Court ( 2003 ) 114 723. Essential, to the lawsuit Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57 81... Constitute, an attorney-client relationship DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) department: 403 See Appleton v. Court. Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters DARIA DOGALAKOVA, ) Number. Hearing Time: 9:00 AM United Family Court: UFCEfiling @ sftc.org submission of the Order, the usually. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM United Family Court: UFCEfiling @ sftc.org 521 528...
Education Conferences In Europe 2023,
Probation Officer Being Unfair,
Articles S