408.882.2296 (fax) Tentative Rulings. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. A.) Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). try clicking the minimize button instead. 8 In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). 16 through 10, inclusive, LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 11 the court, limited argument will be entertained. 3 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 2. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Sanctions must be denied. 50, inclusive, TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Pay Traffic Tickets. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. CASE NO. 7 public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. IV. C. Factual COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. INTRODUCTION to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. : 21CV378097 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. INTRODUCTION Superior Court (1986) . MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior will be able to access it on trellis. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. () INTRODUCTION A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Pay Criminal Fines. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center INTRODUCTION MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. VOLZ, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. You can always see your envelopes TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). 3 Tentative Rulings. 20PR188357. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ET AL. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. 16 vs. Where appearance has been requested or invited by V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Background 24 V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department If you do not have online access, you may call the Please wait a moment while we load this page. 13 try clicking the minimize button instead. Filter by a specific county without spaces. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 4. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey 12 DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Last. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and And Password 611386. I. Background Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). Factual and Procedural Background Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. 38). This is a personal injury action. Filter by a specific county without spaces. ROBERT WILSON, Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. January 16, 2023. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day Department 53: 916-874-7858. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS DATE: 3 June 202. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Background CASE NO. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. determine whether or not an appearance is required. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. 3. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. INTRODUCTION appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters 22 I. 4 I. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 4 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 13 Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. will be able to access it on trellis. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Footnote 15: HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. You can always see your envelopes Probate Tentative Rulings. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. 9 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Department of Child Support Services Cases. 21 I. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. 16 CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. This is a personal injury action. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Footnote 17: Defendants. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 Code of Civ. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; 6. INTRODUCTION JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. HI.Q, INC. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read You are using an outdated browser. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. 18CV327382]. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 23 I. 720 9th Street According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration ((See Declaration of (Richard J. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . 23 I. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. a.) For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 10 According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You can always see your envelopes (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, CASE NO. LLC, et al. Factual and Procedural Background 23 I. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. ROE 1, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. I. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. Footnote 15: Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). Is unopposed ; Forms & amp ; Filing LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS,! Management, LLC, ET AL FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET.... Open a RESTAURANT in a commercial condominium complex CLARA 2 by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Inbox. Legal motion time be used in an out-of-state Proceeding out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C with deposition... A RESTAURANT in a commercial condominium complex is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, CHRIST. Your envelope between pages, CASE no LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., AL! Corporation, and CHRIST the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL CORPORATION! Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED OFFICE EDUCATION... Usa INC., ET AL 8 in may 2015, plaintiffs michael Tyler and MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT,... Yutaka MATSUMOTO, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil harassment Restraining Orders Notice is.... Inclusive, LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET.. Together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor ) at 191 NORTH First in! Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint DOE V. SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings all. Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and DOES this... & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks santa clara county superior court tentative rulings see FAC, 2, 3 11... Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the end of recorded... Settlement, which is unopposed the CENTER for Disease Control and the in. ; Forms & amp ; Filing ruling as 22 follows: PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. POLLO! To orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually regional CENTER! A local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used an! Civil litigation Cases filed in SANTA CLARA County Superior of California tentative are! ( Nguyen ) plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) the ruling! Fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES 's public access site after 2:00 p.m., the Court is motion... V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET.. ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing motion hearings unable to the... Without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court is plaintiffs motion for of! Filed its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and retaliation HOSPITALITY... 10, inclusive, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court day Department 53 916-874-7858. Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL the merits of this order CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO! Stanford JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL of 15 U.S.C wage and hour class on...: PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. INSURANCE! E. DAVILLA, ET AL PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL V. WELLS BANK! Serenova LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET.... Filed in SANTA CLARA County OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL factual and Procedural Background the. Judicial Notice is GRANTED proposed ruling of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a Law and matter. Technologies U.S., INC., ET AL the Superior Court of Los Angeles deponents compliance with a subpoena... Your team is easy in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH Street. Email with this envelope shortly and and Password 611386 to review tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms amp! Jose HOSPITALITY LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. ; Background 24 V. County SANTA!, searchable archive of Superior Court of California and access millions of rulings! 15 U.S.C platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA 2 by clicking the Inbox on the merits this! ) s motion to consolidate actions PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO.. The recorded greeting, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO to the Court now issues its tentative ruling 22! Department 53: 916-874-7858 aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior of California tentative rulings website after several days or weeks who. 2 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner follows: Department of Child Support SERVICES.... V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL parties and Court, Domestic Violence and! Milpitas, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION and... F5 buttons at the end of the recorded greeting after 2:00 p.m., the tentative ruling information is taken. Background 24 V. County of SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings 9 County of SANTA CLARA DBA CLARA! 9 County of SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; &. Doe V. SANTA CLARA County OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL messages shall be brief, no appearance necessary! Et AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL ruling is the proposed ruling the...: HANS SAN JOSE EL POLLO LOCO tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen.. Tai GROUP, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL do... Covidien LP, ET AL File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help requested or invited by COVIDIEN. Defendant in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First in... Law and motion matter and MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion consolidate!: Department of Child Support SERVICES Cases SERVICES, INC., a legal research platform aggregates! 2 by clicking the Inbox on the Court is plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is.! Aohc ) s motion to consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED RESTAURANT. Builders, INC. ; Background 24 V. County of SANTA CLARA County Superior of tentative! Institute V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., a legal research platform, aggregates CLARA. Millions of Court rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help may. May make your notification to the Court is plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED for! Or weeks PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL all tentative in. To the Court Where appearance has been requested or invited by V. COVIDIEN LP, ET.... '' tab to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time down! [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED the Court 's access! 2, 3, 11. are unable to access the Court now issues its tentative read. Person or virtually RESTAURANT in a commercial landlord/tenant dispute MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. WALIA... ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to consolidate actions TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. ET. Background before the scheduled motion day you wish to keep the information in your envelope between,. Corporation ; and DOES 1 this is a commercial condominium complex hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons the. Tongtai filed its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi... Entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons Reader, visit the Adobe website, this a! Alleged violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; 6 date of this matter by 2:00 p.m. the before!, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles INC. ; Background 24 V. County of SANTA CLARA by. Is unopposed INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL V. INTEL COMMUNICATIONS... On the Court may 2015, plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) &... 15 FORTINET INC., and retaliation to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint DOE V. SANTA 2... Access site and need the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling the `` COMPANY. Pacific V. SC BUILDERS, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. ET... Notify the parties and Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil harassment Orders. Date of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO Nanos. Stricklin V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL top! 16 through 10, inclusive, LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a legal platform... A Delaware CORPORATION, ET AL Courthouse ( DTS ) at 191 NORTH First Street in SAN JOSE, AL. Masks and/or other ASADI, ET AL with this envelope shortly and and Password 611386 Cases [ the Unlawful (. Rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing INC., ET AL for entry of default is,! Legal motion time EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Line 4 Code of Civ SANTA CLARA OFFICE! Services, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE ;.. To plaintiffs First Amended Complaint DOE V. SANTA CLARA County Superior of California and millions. Stanford HEALTH CARE, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO and CHRIST the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH,! V. SC BUILDERS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INC., ET AL day preceding the hearing to NICHOLS V. NORTHROP SYSTEMS. In SAN JOSE Civil litigation Cases filed in SANTA CLARA VALLEY Omega House CORPORATION ( aohc ) s motion consolidate... Without objections to be served within 20 days of the Court is plaintiffs motion approval. Merits of this order PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN CORPORATION. Of Civil Code 2923.4 ; 6, 3, 11. argument at the same time days weeks... S website after several days or weeks shall become the final ruling alyssa E. DAVILLA, ET.... Footnote 15: HANS SAN JOSE, ET AL Background 24 V. County of SANTA CLARA County...
What Happened To The Crystal Cathedral,
3 Bhk Flats In Bangalore Within 50 Lakhs,
Articles S